Tumblr page for Racebending.com - Media Consumers for Entertainment Equality.

Please feel free to browse our tumblr page for the latest community-sourced information about media representation in Hollywood.

Reblogged from minarona  479 notes

minarona:

sunbleached-jacket:

nootau:

sunbleached-jacket:

nootau:

sunbleached-jacket:

nootau:

icanonlyprime:

When Japanese actors play as white characters tumblr doesn’t bat an eye.

But when white actors play as characters from another race tumblr…

I am going to post my own rebuttal, but *warning* its going to be a long post.

It’s unrealistic to expect filmmakers to cater to their demographics and alter their artistic vision because their audiences aren’t able to enjoy it if they don’t see characters that look like them.

Hollywood is about making money, not being fair to all races and artists. Hollywood is constantly catering to certain demographics- the white demographic. American films try to appeal to Europe and Australia as well, so they purposely hire white actors to draw in larger audiences and make more $$. There are many directors who want to make movies with non-white characters, but have their movies rejected by Hollywood, or are told to whitewash their characters.

For example, Neil Gaiman wrote a story based on African mythology, and all the characters were black (its called “Anansi Boys”). Hollywood wanted to make a movie of it, but they told the author “of course the characters cant be black in the movie, because black people don’t like fantasy.” They didn’t even want to consider any black actors, even though the writer specifically wanted them to being black.

Or George Lucas- who wanted to make a movie about the African American (emphasis on American, because American does not mean “white”)Tuskegee fighters of World War II. Hollywood refused to fund the movie because it had an entirely black cast. They said that black people are not “marketable” enough, and that nobody would want to watch an expensive movie with only black actors. They insisted that he include some white characters- even though they have no place in the story- to make white audiences happy. Lucas did not want to do that, and so Hollywood refused to pay for his movie- Lucas to pay for the movie with his own money. It bombed, and Hollywood blamed it on the fact that the characters were black (instead of the fact that the movie itself was bad).

Another example! With Asians. Wong Fu Productions (Asian directors) wanted to make a movie called Sleep Shift, in which their main character was an Asian man. Hollywood did not like this idea- they tried to persuade WFP to hire a white actor instead, because they insisted that movies about Asians are not “profitable,” and that movies need white characters in order to be successful. WFP tried arguing with them about it, but Hollywood just ended up cancelling their movie- they did NOT want to make a movie in which the hero was Asian.

Similar thing happened to Iwamatsu- he tried making a TV show with an Asian hero, but Hollywood executives told him that “audiences would shut off the TV if they seen an Asian hero.” Also, Justin Lin tried hiring an Asian lead for his movie “Tokyo Drift,” but the studio demanded that he hire a white actor instead. He had to argue with the studio, just so he could have colorblind auditions.

POC directors are the ones who are truly limited in Hollywood. They want to make movies about Asians, black people, Native Americans, etc. but Hollywood demands that they hire white actors, to cater to white audiences (who are always being pandered to) instead.

Screenwriters are specifically taught to make their main characters usually at least one of these traits: white, straight, or male. Because that’s what “audiences really pay to see.” They’re told to write non-whites as being the background characters, so that they don’t take focus way from what really sells- white characters.

Mainstream movies are not so much about creative and artistic freedom. They are about profiting off of the majority demographic.

I guess I just think a movie is more about story and acting than “pock representation” but okay.

Plenty of POC actors are just as good as white actors? Seriously, a lot of the time, they are not even considered for roles. I’ve known actors who were told to get plastic surgery to look more white, or to change their names to sound “less ethnic.” Or that they would never be successful, because they are not white. Look at Dev Patel- he is a rather good Indian-British actor, but he is typecasted. He says he usually only gets considered for stereotypical Indian roles like nerd or taxi driver, and that its harder for him to get a better role than that. Meanwhile, Megan Fox and Kirsten Stewart are mediocore white actresses who get lea roles because they are popular.

Also, non-white stories are just as good as any white person’s story too, and yet we don’t see much movies about them in comparison. It’s not like race doesn’t have anything to do with people’s experiences anyway. The experience of a Mexican-American in LA is going to be vastly different than a black living in say, Japan.

If I’m white and I go to India, would it be right for me to complain that I don’t see any white people in their films? No.

See, this is the weakest excuse. India is over 96% Indian/non-white. Japan is over 99% Japanese. It’s dumb to expect white people in an Indian or Japanese movie, because hardly any white people ilive in those countries. (but you know what? Japanese anime actually has a lot of white characters. Attack on Titan, Fullmetal Alcemist, Porco Rosso, Howls Moving Castle, etc. all have white or European characters. White people are represented MORE than they should be in Japanese media)

The US, on the other hand, is diverse. For example, I live in San Francisco. It’s around 40% white here, so why is that when I watch movies that take place in SF, themovies portray it as 90% white? Same thing with New York City. It’s only around 40% white, and yet in the movies, you mostly only see white characters and maybe a few black characters.

Really, you don’t want to get into the demographic argument. Studies show Hollywood fails to keep up with how diverse the real America is. For example, Asians make up 5-6% of the US, but barely 1% of Hollywood lead roles. Native Americans, on the other hand, are far UNDER 1%.

America is NOT a white country. There are many non-white actors, directors, writers, etc. who want to make movies starring non-white characters, but again, Hollywood REJECTS them. Tells them that audiences will not like them as much since they are not white, and that they wold have a better chance if they were white.

Because America is mostly American. Korea is mostly Korean. Japan is mostly Japanese. Kenya is mostly Kenyan. Russia is mostly Russian./You can find a movie with all Koreans, all Indians, all Brazilians, etc. In America you have a much higher chance of finding a movie with multiple races.

"America is mostly American." What does that even mean? America is not a race. It’s a nationality. America is made of hundreds of different ethnic groups from Asia, Africa, Latin America, etc. Korea is NOT diverse, so therefore Korean movies are accurately representing their country.

Also, Brazil in itself racially diverse. Brazilian is like America, it’s not an ethnic background, it’s a nationality. Brazil has MANY black, Native American and Japanese people, yet their own movies usually only show white or light skinned Brazilians. So Brazil is not much better than American TV.

If you want to see people who look like your race (assuming you’re not white), there are plenty of great foreign films.

That doesn’t work for everybody. What about Native Americans? They belong to the United States, and yet American TV ignores the fact that they exist for the most part. They can’t look to Chinese and Mexican TV and see themselves “represented,” they have nowhere to turn to.

Also, people in America and in other countries again, have vastly different experiences. A Chinese-American lives a different life and culture than a person living in China does. Are they supposed to really relate to Chinese characters who live in China? I know I’m half Asian, I don’t relate to characters who live in another coutnry. Their culture is foreign to me, just like I’m foreign to them. I want to see more mixed race or Asian-American characters, I can relate to their stories better because their experience is more like my own.

In the end, again… mainstream movies are not about being fair to minoriteis. We are underrepresented, studies prove it. And a lot of the time, we are not even portrayed well on TV. I can’t name many Asian characters who are not either nerdy, martial artists, or immigrants with really thick accents. We are portrayed in a very one-dimensional way, as if we are cardboard cut outs. And whenever some director comes along and tries to fix it, they’re either forced to whitewash the characters or have their movie canceled altoghether.

Then whenever we say we want more diversity, people say that we’re just trying to take creative freedom away from white artists. When POC artists are the ones who have their creative freedom limited, by being told that non-white characters arent as “profitable.” You dont have to care, but I do, because I've wanted to be both an actress and a director in my life.

    adventureswithdragons asked
    About the Ghost in The Shell post - that casting choice is horrid and beneficial to no one. I did an internship at a casting agency for 4 months this year and I was surprised by the amount of diversity there was in our books. There were people from all over the world. It broke my heart that so many valid, potentially talented applicants were ignored due to final production choices based on racial prejudice. :/

    Answer:

    fyeahlilbit3point0:

    isaia:

    OHhhh my god.

    Thank you for telling me this. In an interview for a Japanese talk show, somewhere after Pacific Rim premiered, (it’s the ‘Bugsy’ interview on dailymotion w/ english subs) Rinko Kikuchi was talking about how she’d constantly audition for roles she knew she wouldn’t get.

    But lately I noticed they’d always cast her as a dragon lady or side banana.

    I would really, really like to know specifically who is responsible for this. I really would. 

    Or even more recently Maggie Q talking about how before Nikita, the only role she were ever offered were bit parts or Dragon Ladies. 

    There was a really interesting article I read last year too, about how a lot of Asian-American actors and musicians (singers, rappers, ect.) are just straight up going to countries like Korea and Japan because it’s almost impossible for them to find steady work in the U.S.

    Which is what gets me when directors say they couldn’t find actors of the right ethnicity. There are tons of Asian-American (or even just Asian) actors attempting to get work in Hollywood; the studios just ignore them and then pretend there aren’t enough actors for the right roles.

Reblogged from ulinawi  2,929 notes
    Anonymous asked
    The author of Hunger Games explained Katniss in a difficult way. How did y'all they were supposed to find a Native American actress with olive skin, naturally straight black hair and grey eyes. Please give me a link to one and I'll shut up forever.

    Answer:

    ulinawi:

    sikssaapo-p:

    burdenedwithgloriousbooty:

    reverseracism:

    There’s plenty of lists with Native American actresses you can google yourself.

    Gray eyes aren’t a white only trait, nor is Jennifer Lawrence a gray eyed gal. So please do shut up forever.

    ~Eon

    I have grey eyes, and from my highly unscientific observations, grey eyes are the third most common eye colour among NDNs, after black and brown. There’s even Grey Eyes as a surename among some NDNs. 

    But I digress. Throw some contact lenses on Q’orianka Kilcher, Keisha Castle-Huges or Jade Willoughby and you still have a better Katniss. 

    I have a cousin, who is “full blood, I mean her father, her mother, her grandparents, all Native. and by the Gods - she has green eyes, with hint of like light brown.

    I have gray eyes. And I’m an Indian from the same area Katniss is from (Southern Appalachia), mixed like Katniss, and from a coal mining family like Katniss. My brother and cousin both have gray eyes too. And my cousin has a higher BQ than me. So.

    The white person cast as Katniss doesn’t have the hair color or skin tone or eye color in the character description and this anon wants to know about NDN eye color.

Reblogged from phoenix-ace  1,643 notes

phoenix-ace:

Mixed doesn’t mean white.

Light hair doesn’t mean white.

Light skin doesn’t mean white.

Light eyes do not equal white.  

And being mixed doesn’t mean someone is automatically going to be light skinned or white-passing.  

So stop using any of those traits as an excuse to whitewash.

Stop derailing criticism of whitewashing with “Well what about mixed people?”. Stop pretending that people who whitewash are showing any real kind of nuance or consideration towards mixed and/or light skinned people of color when they do that.  They’re erasing us too because if they really meant to represent mixed people, the’d just cast a mixed person.  Not a white person with a spray tan. 

Reblogged from gunmetalskies  791 notes

gunmetalskies:

If I ever become notable enough as an author that my books become films, I swear I’m going to start a novel like this some day…

Aeron was dark. And by dark I don’t mean morose in mood or unscrupulous of conscious. Aeron was dark of skin. Aeron was dark of skin because the melanocytes of his ancestors needed to increase melanin production to defend against the ultraviolet radiation inherent in living near the equator.
What’s more is that he wasn’t just dark of skin but noticeably dark of skin to the most colorblind racist in the land.
It was notable in such a way that in the event of this novel becoming a film, a casting director couldn’t possibly interview a single white person for the role.

"What is whitewashing?" Said Gorbatrexicon the satyr.

"Why…" Said Aeron "It’s the act of licking ones own asshole while simultaneously complaining about the taste of shit." After which he mounted his dragon, and flew into a beautiful sunset.

Reblogged from the-midnight-doe  2,904 notes
the-midnight-doe:

rocketverliden:

katwylder:

boogiekun:

katwylder:

rocketverliden:

gabzilla-z:

espanolbot:

The Wolf of Wall Street's Margot Robbie is in talks to lead DreamWorks' live-action adaptation of the 1995 hit anime movie Ghost in the Shell, to be directed by Snow White and the Huntsman's Rupert Sanders.
….NO! NO! Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Seriously? Not even bothering to ATTEMPT to get an actress of Japanese descent to play the lead?
Oh, I see. It’s because the logic that “anime is racially ambiguous” or something? ‘Cause, after all, there’s no reason why a character called MOKOTO KUSANAGI be Japanese, right?
ARGH!

WHAT

You know, this reminds me of that time they tried to make a live-action Evangelion and they were apparently going to change Asuka’s name and probably origin.
Like, really, can it be that hard to get a Japanese lead actress? Like, Rinko Kikuchi or someone, y’know, more appropriate?

Change “Evangelion” to “any anime or Asian media,” and “Asuka” to “every non-white character.” Because this is what happens literally every fucking time.
Also, yes, it really is that hard to get a lead who is Japanese when you are racist.

I feel that unless the story is solely based arround the fact that the character is japanese, race doesn’t matter. Like we were able to get a black spiderman! HOWEVER- If they turned away actresses aiming for the part SOLELY because they were japanese- then i can see that as being racist. As for the japanese names- I think they should stay true and actors/actresses should practice saying them perfectly.

Yeah, the thing is, “race shouldn’t matter” is a nice sentiment in theory but always seems to work out in practice as, “only cast white people.”
1) And while movie studios are perfectly happy to cast white actors for characters who are non-white, the reverse practically NEVER happens. This has been shown to be the case time and time again. Most of the time, studios don’t reject people of color for these parts, because those actors are never even considered. Plus, the majority of roles in Hollywood already go to white actors. Would it really be so awful to let Motoko be… I dunno, anything but white?
2) If you wanna know how “critical” her ethnicity is, you’d probably have to ask Masamune. But considering he named her Kusanagi, I would say that it’s probably sort of important. And why should being Japanese have to be “critical” to Mokoto’s character to warrant her being played by an actress who is Japanese (or even any east Asian descent)? Why should that have to be justified?
3) As for there being a black Spider-man… That is not an equivalent situation and it’s disingenuous to act as though it is. They didn’t change Peter Parker’s race. They created a whole new character who is black, (Miles Morales), and takes up the mantle of Spider-man after Parker.
So, let’s call this what it is: more racism in casting.

As someone who’s watched the ‘95 film and Stand Alone Complex, it is kinda ambiguous on whether or not it takes place in Japan. I guess you can say it pretty much does, though.

They literally mention several dozen times that they are Japanese I have no idea how you’re missing that.
Every single iteration of Ghost in the Shell has at the very least taken place in Asia and that was an incredibly important part of the setting (Hong Kong was chosen for the movie due to its architecture and cityscapes, Japan was chosen for the anime to put a specific origin point of Section 9 and also to give a full background story to the refugee plot in 2nd Gig, etc.)
Why is it that in order for a person of color to be casted for a character that is a person of color, we need a reason? “Oh, her race has to be important to the story!” “Oh, she looks ambiguous, why does it matter?” And yet we never hear these reasons thrown at white actors. It reinforces the idea that characters are white until proven minority which is, yes indeed, racist, whether they “meant it” or not.
The Major is Japanese. That’s it, end of story. There is no excuse for this. And you can bet your ass that this won’t be the only case of white washing in this movie.

the-midnight-doe:

rocketverliden:

katwylder:

boogiekun:

katwylder:

rocketverliden:

gabzilla-z:

espanolbot:

The Wolf of Wall Street's Margot Robbie is in talks to lead DreamWorks' live-action adaptation of the 1995 hit anime movie Ghost in the Shell, to be directed by Snow White and the Huntsman's Rupert Sanders.

….NO! NO! Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Seriously? Not even bothering to ATTEMPT to get an actress of Japanese descent to play the lead?

Oh, I see. It’s because the logic that “anime is racially ambiguous” or something? ‘Cause, after all, there’s no reason why a character called MOKOTO KUSANAGI be Japanese, right?

ARGH!

WHAT

You know, this reminds me of that time they tried to make a live-action Evangelion and they were apparently going to change Asuka’s name and probably origin.

Like, really, can it be that hard to get a Japanese lead actress? Like, Rinko Kikuchi or someone, y’know, more appropriate?

Change “Evangelion” to “any anime or Asian media,” and “Asuka” to “every non-white character.” Because this is what happens literally every fucking time.

Also, yes, it really is that hard to get a lead who is Japanese when you are racist.

I feel that unless the story is solely based arround the fact that the character is japanese, race doesn’t matter. Like we were able to get a black spiderman! HOWEVER- If they turned away actresses aiming for the part SOLELY because they were japanese- then i can see that as being racist. As for the japanese names- I think they should stay true and actors/actresses should practice saying them perfectly.

Yeah, the thing is, “race shouldn’t matter” is a nice sentiment in theory but always seems to work out in practice as, “only cast white people.”

1) And while movie studios are perfectly happy to cast white actors for characters who are non-white, the reverse practically NEVER happens. This has been shown to be the case time and time again. Most of the time, studios don’t reject people of color for these parts, because those actors are never even considered. Plus, the majority of roles in Hollywood already go to white actors. Would it really be so awful to let Motoko be… I dunno, anything but white?

2) If you wanna know how “critical” her ethnicity is, you’d probably have to ask Masamune. But considering he named her Kusanagi, I would say that it’s probably sort of important. And why should being Japanese have to be “critical” to Mokoto’s character to warrant her being played by an actress who is Japanese (or even any east Asian descent)? Why should that have to be justified?

3) As for there being a black Spider-man… That is not an equivalent situation and it’s disingenuous to act as though it is. They didn’t change Peter Parker’s race. They created a whole new character who is black, (Miles Morales), and takes up the mantle of Spider-man after Parker.

So, let’s call this what it is: more racism in casting.

As someone who’s watched the ‘95 film and Stand Alone Complex, it is kinda ambiguous on whether or not it takes place in Japan. I guess you can say it pretty much does, though.

They literally mention several dozen times that they are Japanese I have no idea how you’re missing that.

Every single iteration of Ghost in the Shell has at the very least taken place in Asia and that was an incredibly important part of the setting (Hong Kong was chosen for the movie due to its architecture and cityscapes, Japan was chosen for the anime to put a specific origin point of Section 9 and also to give a full background story to the refugee plot in 2nd Gig, etc.)

Why is it that in order for a person of color to be casted for a character that is a person of color, we need a reason? “Oh, her race has to be important to the story!” “Oh, she looks ambiguous, why does it matter?” And yet we never hear these reasons thrown at white actors. It reinforces the idea that characters are white until proven minority which is, yes indeed, racist, whether they “meant it” or not.

The Major is Japanese. That’s it, end of story. There is no excuse for this. And you can bet your ass that this won’t be the only case of white washing in this movie.

Reblogged from thisisnotlatinx  1,853 notes

thisisnotlatino:

Woody Allen Says He Won’t Hire A Black Actor Unless The Role Calls For One

So, you know Woody Allen, of course. The filmmaker who’s seemingly been a critics’ darling, since the early 70’s; Your typical liberal New Yorker, who also loves to play jazz. But there’s that one thing though. You know what I’m talking about. That one thing that’s been whispered about, or even loudly discussed, ever since Allen’s started writing and directing his own films. And that thing is, the fact that you never see black people in his movies.

And considering that most of his films have been set in New York, one of the most racially diverse cities on the entire planet, how is it that black people are virtually non-existent in his films?

Well that’s not entirely true. There have been a few exceptions. There was Sonia Rolland playing Josephine Baker in “Midnight in Paris,” although she was basically relegated to the background, as an extra with no lines. And there was Hazelle Goodman in his 1997 film “Deconstructing Harry,” playing… take a guess, a prostitute but of course.

And that’s about as much as I can come up with.

So what’s the problem? Why hasn’t Allen had black actors in his films?

Well, he was just recently asked that question in a profile about him, in the New York Observer (HERE). When asked why black actors haven’t appeared in his films, the writer of the piece states that Allen was “horrified” when the subject was brought up.

But Allen has his reasons. It’s very simple. According to the filmmaker: “Not unless I write a story that requires it. You don’t hire people based on race. You hire people based on who is correct for the part. The implication is that I’m deliberately not hiring black actors, which is stupid. I cast only what’s right for the part. Race, friendship means nothing to me except who is right for the part.”

O.K. you want to run that by me again. Talk about contradictory. He doesn’t hire a black actor unless the story requires it but at the same time he doesn’t hire based on race. HUH? I’ve read it a few times already and still doesn’t make sense.

But not to fear because Allen is friends with both Chris Rock, who he once took out to dinner in Rome and Spike Lee “I’m friendly with Spike Lee. We don’t socialize, but I don’t socialize with anyone.” There’s a punchline: “I don’t have white friends either.”

Oh that Woody. Always good for a laugh.

So what do you say about this or you really don’t care? Or is Allen really being upfront and honest about how many filmmakers think. That is unless the part actually calls for a black or POC actor it’s not even on their wavelength. That should not be really surprise anyone should it?

The message is basically if you’re a black actor don’t bother showing up at any casting calls for Allen’s movie. But hey, Tyler is still hiring.


Slime ball.
-m